AI fraud accelerates US’ shift toward cryptographic digital identity | Biometric Update

xxx

NIST’s draft practice guide SP 1800-42A outlines how financial institutions could use mobile driver’s licenses (mDLs) for online customer identification.
The document is voluntary and does not require banks to accept mDLs. However, it provides a reference architecture for incorporating state-issued cryptographic credentials into existing Customer Identification Program processes.

From: AI fraud accelerates US’ shift toward cryptographic digital identity | Biometric Update.

xxx

Tokenized money market funds, deposit tokens, gold market infrastructure

xxx

Then Stuart introduces an overlooked monetary asset: tokenized money market funds (TMMFs). These don’t directly represent dollars, although they are similar in form and value to a stablecoin backed by cash and short-term government debt. But they aren’t stablecoins, which means they can earn a yield. And they can sit next to stablecoins in digital wallets, holding and remunerating idle balances.

Regular readers will know that I’ve written about this often before: in my view, stablecoins shouldn’t earn yield as that distorts incentives, and they won’t need to once tokenized money market funds become more accessible to all.

From: Tokenized money market funds, deposit tokens, gold market infrastructure.

xxx

Trump issues EO to revisit Fed master accounts for fintechs | American Banker

xxx

The order directed the Fed to, within the next 120 days, “conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the legal, regulatory, and policy framework governing access to Reserve Bank payment accounts and payment services by uninsured depository institutions and non-bank financial companies, including those engaged in digital assets and other novel financial activities.”

From: Trump issues EO to revisit Fed master accounts for fintechs | American Banker.

xxx

Stablecoins: separating payments from credit

xxx

Perhaps more significant, it would also establish a basis for a payment network that did not rely on the solvency of bank loans. Stepping back and zooming out, this could potentially enhance the resilience of the US economy. In the event of another banking crisis, payments could continue to flow unimpeded through non-bank institutions.

From: Stablecoins: separating payments from credit.

xxx

SoFi’s Tokenized Deposit Strategy Doesn’t Need Tokenization

xxx

According to Federal Reserve research cited in its announcement, roughly $64 billion in stablecoins sits in inactive or rarely used wallets, earning little or nothing. Why leave money in a non-interest-bearing stablecoin when it could earn 4.40% in an FDIC-insured account until it’s needed?

From: SoFi’s Tokenized Deposit Strategy Doesn’t Need Tokenization.

xxx

 

Then Why Did SoFi Tokenize Deposits?

A couple of possibilities:

Marketing. Being the first nationally chartered bank to offer tokenized deposits to consumers might resonate with crypto investors in ways that another high-yield savings account wouldn’t.
Tech stack. Another possibility is that SoFi is building infrastructure for future products that conventional deposit systems would struggle to support.

SoFi’s Tokenized Deposit Strategy Doesn’t Need Tokenization

Ron Shevlin, someone I always pay attention to, argues that tokenized deposits are primarily an efficiency play for banks, improving how money moves and transactions are processed, rather than an effectiveness play that attracts customers, generates revenue or drives growth. I agree, it seems clear that they are a defensive strategy.

The Week in Review – Behind Fintech / 24 October 2026

xxx

European financial regulators are questioning Google after a cloud computing outage on 20 October disrupted banking services for millions of customers. Revolut, HSBC and Lloyds were among those affected, with customers experiencing problems accessing accounts, making card payments and withdrawing cash.
Google attributed the disruption, which lasted several hours, to a power failure at a third-party facility supporting its London cloud infrastructure. The European Banking Authority (EBA) has requested information about the incident and its impact on financial institutions. UK regulators are also examining the disruption.

From: The Week in Review – Behind Fintech / 24 October 2026.

xxx

Well if that’s all it takes (a power failure at one facility) to bring down banks, I imagine that Russian cyber strategists, North Korean ransomware specialists and mischief-makers of all kinds will be rubbing their hands with glee. Who knew that despite stress testing and risk analysis and DORA and everything else that the financial sector is on such thin ice?

Embedded RFID Tags Could Change How Retailers Handle Returns

According to the National Retail Federation’s 2025 Retail Return Report, somthing like one sixth of annual sales end in returns, rising to almost one firth for online sales. It also says 9% of 2025 holiday returns were fraudulent, while three-quarters of retailers reported that the problem was worsening.

I had no idea

 

So how do you now that what is returned is what was shipped? One idea being proposed, which is actually rather an old idea, is to put an RFID tag inside a grament seam or integrated into an existing brand label or some other compnent during manufacturing. The tag gives each unit a persistent identifier that can help show where the item came from, how it moved and whether it has been replaced. But that only tells you that the tag is real: it may have been swapped.

Embedded RFID Tags Could Change How Retailers Handle Returns

xxx

The article cites the National Retail Federation’s 2025 Retail Return Report, which found that 15.8% of annual sales end in returns, rising to 17% during the holiday season and 19.3% for online sales. It also says 9% of 2025 holiday returns were fraudulent, while 75% of retailers reported that the problem was worsening.

That creates a visibility gap. Retail systems can track an item through the point of sale, shipping and inventory, but the identifier may disappear once the product is sold. That makes tactics such as empty-box returns, overstated quantity claims and item swaps difficult to verify at the counter.

Sensormatic’s proposed answer is an embedded RFID tag, placed inside a seam or integrated into an existing brand or care label during manufacturing. The tag gives each unit a persistent identifier that can help show where the item came from, how it moved and whether it has been replaced.

From: Embedded RFID Tags Could Change How Retailers Handle Returns.

xxx

Create your own website, free on WordPress.com.Create your own website.
Start free