I happened to be listening to a SlateTBD podcast about AI generated music. One of the presenters was talking about AI “slop” music being piped into to bars and restaurants and elevators and wherever. She said “most people consume music passively, and I don’t think they’re going to mind that much that what they’re consuming passively is AI”. This immediately made me think about George Orwell’s “1984”, in which he wrote
The tune had been haunting London for weeks past. It was one of countless similar songs published for the benefit of the proles by a sub-section of the Music Department. The words of these songs were composed without any human intervention whatever on an instrument known as a versificator.
If only Orwell had know just how accurate a prediction this was. He wrote it long before the internet, long before Large Language Models (LLMs) and long before streaming sites. But as of now, one of streaming sites willing to disclose the statistics says that almost a fifth of the music uploaded for distribution is AI generated. Now, while pretty much all of the new music I hear via the wireless sounds AI generated to me, some of it is apparently real.
It seems, though, that no-one cares.
So, here’s a question for you payments people out there. Do consumers see retail payments more akin to elevator music or psychotherapy.
xxx
There’s a new song doing the rounds, and in the immortal words of Kylie Minogue, you just can’t get it out of your head.
But what if it was created by a robot, or the artist themself is a product of artificial intelligence (AI)? Do streaming sites have an obligation to label music as AI-generated? And does it even matter, if you like what you hear?
A survey published last week suggested 97% of respondents could not spot an AI-generated song.
From: How can you tell if music is AI-generated?.
xxx