A library of snippets
xxx
The network, called Red Belly Blockchain, was developed by the Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the University of Sydney, and deployed over the Amazon Web Services (AWS) global cloud infrastructure.
It was tested across 1,000 nodes in 14 countries at a benchmark rate of 30,000 transactions per second and with an average latency of three seconds.
xxx
xxx
Circle noted that USDC is built on openness and accountability, with commercial issuers required to be licensed to handle electronic money, to have audited AML and compliance programs, to back all tokens on a fully reserved basis and to provide monthly published proof of reserves, to support fungible exchange and redemption of USDC tokens from other authorized issuer members, and to meet other reporting and review requirements established by CENTRE.
More like Mondex than Bitcoin, frankly.
So what is a “stablecoin” anyway? If it is meant to be a coin that maintains purchasing power over time then why would you back it with US dollars, which do not? If it is meant to be a coin that
Well, this was first tried donkey’s years’ ago when Digicash launched. The idea of of a crypto coin that represented a dollar, a euro, a pound or whatever. This
There’s a difference between a currency and a currency board. A currency board issues a currency (let’s say Zimbabwean Dollars) that is backed by a 100% reserve in another currency (let’s say South African Rand). So, for example, if I issued DaveCoin and each DaveCoin
Now, if that sounds pointless – why would you use DaveDollars when you could use USDollars? – you have to remember that lots of people do this already. When I give Safaricom at Kenyan Shilling, they in turn give me an M-PESA Kenyan Shilling which is more useful to me because I can send it to someone else using my mobile phone. All of the Kenyan Shillings that are in the form of M-PESA account balances are backed one-for-one by Kenyan Shillings in Safaricom’s bank account.
Under European electronic money laws, this is how things should work. If I give you an e-Euro, I ,must have an actual Euro in “tier 1” capital. The point of this is that
xxx
A first time buyer whose dream to purchase a flat was temporarily derailed by a Barclays IT glitch yesterday faces heartbreak today as NatWest’s banking system failed.
From First-time buyer is left ‘homeless’ as Barclays and NatWest banking crash | Daily Mail Online.
xxx
xxx
“You’d never manage that these days – they could probably tell you what type of dog was doing the running for you.”
xxx
xxx
In the United States currently, there’s no legal requirement stipulating a financial institution must make a consumer’s financial data available to a third party in the event that a consumer provides affirmative consent.
From U.S. way behind the curve on open banking | American Banker.
xxx
xxx
While the Treasury Department cannot address the intrinsic, structural disadvantages in the U.S. regulatory regime, its recent call for all of the agencies in this space to align behind an interpretation of Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act — which asserts the ability of Americans to permission their financial data — is an important step towards a level playing field,
From U.S. way behind the curve on open banking | American Banker.
xxx
xxx
In a UK first, customers who receive a call from Barclays will now be able to choose to receive an alert in their app or online banking confirming the details of the employee who is calling them.
From Barclays tackles phone scammers with caller ID feature.
So good to see a bank doing this. I wrote
Remember when, earlier this year, the main US carriers Verizon Wireless, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint (as the “Mobile Authentication Taskforce”) announced their plan to launch a mobile authentication solution that will be available to consumers by the end of 2018. The idea of it is to securely authenticate users by using their mobile number, IP address, SIM card attributes and so on, using machine learning and so forth to reduce the risks in mobile commerce.
(They said at the time that the service would be interoperable with the GSMA’s Mobile Connect scheme, which is great).
Well, they’ve now announced their “Project Verify” which will deliver authentication in mobile apps, negating the need for a traditional password. You can see the attraction for users: it means major convenience.
xxx
n 1303, a Persian vizier recounted the use of fingerprints as signatures during the Qin and Han Dynasties, noting, “Experience has shown that no two individuals have fingers precisely alike.” The Chinese had realized that before anyone: a Qin dynasty document from the third-century B.C.E, titled “The Volume of Crime Scene Investigation—Burglary,” pointed up fingerprints as a means of evincing whodunnit.
xxx
xxx
Among Amazon Prime respondents, 65% would be willing to try a free online bank account offered by Amazon. Even among people who don’t buy through Amazon, 37% would be willing to try. Amazon customers are quite valuable. They control 75% of US household wealth
From Can Amazon Take Customer Loyalty to the Bank? – Bain & Company.
xxx
Alex Brazier is the Executive Director for Financial Stability Strategy and Risk and a member of the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) at the Bank of England. He’s not a techno-utopian fintech hype merchant like me, he’s an economist. Earlier this year, he gave a speech talking about open banking in which he said that “by allowing customers to connect to a range of banks and service providers through a single point, Open Banking could open to the door to the ‘unbundling’ of banking”.
At Consult Hyperion we don’t think there’s any “could” about it but, as my colleague Tim Richards wrote earlier this year, some banks will thrive in the world of open banking while will simply become utilities, highly regulated pools of capital. He goes on to say that while both models are acceptable – which is why some of the work we are doing helping clients to determine their open banking strategies is so interesting – as a bank surely it would be better to choose your strategy rather than being forced into a model you may not be well suited for.
For a consumer perspective, it could be argued that the unbundling is a good thing. Bringing together bundles of services from different providers is actually quite an appealing vision of the banking front-end of the future. The problem, from the banks’ perspective, is that that the front-end neither needs to be a bank nor wants to be a bank. Quite the reverse, in fact. The people who are good at front-ends (eg, Amazon) are perfectly happy to take control of the interface with the consumer and, as per Tim’s point, leave the banks as heavily regulated, low margin pipes sitting out of sight as the equivalent of utility companies but for money rather than gas, water or electricity.
How can banks compete with this? Well, they can become technology companies. Now, I know that the “meme” that banks are, essentially, a special kind of technology company (special because they are granted special privileges that other companies do not have, such as the ability to create money) is not mainstream, it deserves attention. It means, apart from anything else, that bank boards will need to include switched-on technologists and take a strategic view of technology, as Christian Edelmann and Patrick Hunt said in the Harvard Business Review: “Technology specialists will play a greater role in allocating investments, working alongside senior management from a more traditional background”.
//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js
This is a point that was well made by my old friend Brett King when I had my “fireside chat” with him at the Consult Hyperion Unconference in Manhattan last month. We talked about his new book “Bank 4.0”, in which he says that the foundation of banking in the coming era is “being great at technology” and one or two other things. If you’d like to learn more, you can listen to Brett and I discussing the book in the latest Tomorrow’s Transactions podcast available here on our web site or via our iTunes feed.
In the book Brett quotes Francisco Gonzalez, the Executive Chairman of BBVA, as saying that sooner or later it will be the internet giants (including Amazon) who will be his main rivals rather than other banks. This is why BBVA is reinventing its processes to being new products and services to the markets. But can banks really become technology companies? Many observers think not. Instead they posit a future for banks as financial factories who have to accept the new order and partner with Amazon and others. Lenders would manufacture financial products, and tech giants would serve as distribution and servicing channels. In other words, Amazon’s future is to do with financial products what Amazon already does with other products.
What’s more, as that Bloomberg article notes, because Amazon wouldn’t have to pay to lure customers — it already has millions of them — it could afford to set up digital accounts without “all the nuisance fees and relatively high minimum balances” that lenders impose. The Wall Street Journal says similarly that banks “face pressure to build relationships with big online platforms, which reach billions of users and drive a growing share of commerce” when reporting on Facebook’s request to banks to share detailed financial information about their customers, including transactions and balances, “as part of an effort to offer new services to users”.
As Tim and I have mentioned before, in Europe the banks won’t have any choice about this. The CMA Remedies in the UK (since January) and PSD2 implementation throughout Europe from next year means that it will be the consumers who will have the choice whether to give the internet giants access to their accounts, not the banks’. This is why it is so important for banks, payment companies and others in the space to develop business strategies for the open banking world – now.
Snippings