How black cab drivers and passengers collude to cheat the taxman

xxx

A regular occurrence in London, when asking for a fare receipt, is an offer of a couple of unsigned receipts or an offer to put any figure down. The taxi driver keeps no duplicate record of the transaction. This deprives the taxman of the cab driver’s tax and encourages the customer to cheat their employer and HM Revenue & Customs. This conspiracy to defraud has been going on for decades.

An Uber receipt clearly states the origin and destination of a journey and the price paid. This eliminates fraud. As an employer I trust an Uber receipt, but view a licensed taxi receipt with suspicion.

From How black cab drivers and passengers collude to cheat the taxman

xxx

POST Money and markets

As my colleague Neil McEvoy and I wrote in the DEMOS Quarterly way back in 1996

Endogenous money is money created within a market whereas exogenous money is money created by some outside authority and imposed on a market. We’re used to the second – where the outside authority is the government – and have forgotten about the first, but pressures on the monetary system may have reached the point where a change is inevitable.

xxx

China bank calls documents fake after bond default on Alibaba-linked platform | Reuters

xxx

The fate of a defaulted $45 million Chinese corporate bond sold through an Alibaba-backed online wealth management platform was thrown into doubt on Monday… China Guangfa Bank Co Ltd (CGB) said guarantee documents, official seals and personal seals presented by the insurer of the bonds “are all fake” and that it has reported the matter to the police.

From China bank calls documents fake after bond default on Alibaba-linked platform | Reuters

xxx

Enigma technology to make new ultra-secure bank card

xxx

In a similar vein, Barclays customers will tap their PIN into a keypad mounted on the card which will create a range of security ciphers.

The codes will be generated at a timed interval by a tiny clock and appear next to the signature strip.

From Enigma technology to make new ultra-secure bank card

This is pretty much what the card will look like I think.

 Visa SuperSmartCard

Actually, I’m being a little naughty here. That picture is actually of the Visa SuperSmartCard, produced by Toshiba back in 1986, but I imagine the Barclays one will work in pretty much the same way.

Digital payment: Post demonetisation, which digital payment method to use? Here’s how to choose – The Economic Times

xxx

Unified Payment Interface, or UPI, provided by various banks could be considered safer than other modes in this respect. In case of UPI, one needs to enter only the Virtual Payment Address, or VPA, of the recipient, which is more secure and easy than sharing credentials such as account numbers and IFSC codes.

From Digital payment: Post demonetisation, which digital payment method to use? Here’s how to choose – The Economic Times

xxx

POST Reputation means transactions

There was interesting discussion on Twitter the other day (as there often is) about the relationship between identity and reputation. The discussion was in the context of “fake news” but it raised a number of general points about reputation and the reputation economy that are worth reflecting on. One particular point was whether a reputation must link one-to-one with a confirmed identity in order for the reputation to be useful. I think it doesn’t, and I can point to a particular case study which I think triggered a lot of this kind of thinking in my own mind.

Many many years ago in the early days of electronic commerce and digital money and online payments and all those good things, I came across a mailing list (I’m not sure what it was called it at the beginning but it later became known as the e$ list) that I found very useful. The list had links to interesting stories, discussions and very well-informed debate on the then very new topics of money and transactions in an interconnected world. One day, there was a message on the mailing list saying that it was going to be discontinued because the person or people running it couldn’t continue to do it as voluntary effort, so without some form of sponsorship they would have to stop.

Since my colleagues and I found a list very useful we stepped up to the plate and agreed to provide some sponsorship money. The list operator asked us to send the money to an ISP to cover their charges for the next six months or the next year or something. This we did and thus we became sponsors.

mailing lists (sponsored by Hyperion & C2Net Software)

From Welcome to the e$ Web Site

Now, it was only afterwards that I realised that we had just been through a commercial transaction with an entirely unknown counterparty. I didn’t know whether the mailing list was run by a person, a group of students, a rival company or agents of a foreign power trying to collect contact details of key players in the electronic money field. I didn’t know, and I didn’t care. The quality of the list established over a period of months (in other words, the reputation of the list) was the necessary ingredient for the transaction to take place. Of course, I later discovered that the list was curated by “Robert Hettinga” but that meant nothing to me and I had no clue whether he was a real personal not (he is: I’ve met him!).

My point is that reputation is sufficient. I did not know who or what was providing the news, but the news and the discussions were of sufficient quality to merit our money.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started