xxx
When Francois Reihani opened La La Land Kind Café in Dallas three years ago, he knew immediately that it would be cashless.
“The main reason was for sanitary purposes,” Reihani said. “I’m a bit of a germaphobe, and cash is a very dirty thing. I wanted to keep it away from where we prepare food and drinks.”
Fewer than two miles away at the edge of Dallas’ nightlife neighborhood of Deep Ellum, Sky Rocket Burger had a different reason for refusing cash earlier this year. The place had two break-ins when the register was taken both times.
A nearby pizza joint, Serious Pizza, a common late-night spot wedged into a string of bars, has also switched to cashless payments in part to move the line of club goers along at a quicker pace.
From Cash is no longer king in the U.S., but will it ever go away? | American Banker:
xxx
When New York fines the ice cream seller Van Leeuwen $12,000 for not equipping its stores to accept cash, thereby violating the city’s ban on cashless businesses, you have to wonder what the dynamic is. Presumably if the persecuted purveyor found it cost effective to accept cash instead of electronic payments, then they would. But presumably they made a calculation along the lines of the cost of a register and the wasted counter space and the cost of taking notes and giving change and the cost of the float and shrinkage and the employee time to count, bag and deposit cash is greater than fees for accepting cards.
If cash was cost effective for them, they would take it. It isn’t, so they don’t. If you force them to take it, then you are raising their costs.
A ban on cashlessness is, essentially, a tax. The city wasn’t offering to cover the cost of accepting the cash.
There are a variety of reasons as to why someone in New York might not have access to an electronic means of payment and there is no need to list them here, other than to note that for some people who do not have a bank account, the alternative of prepaid cards can be costly.