xxx
The digital currency, which is backed by traditional fiat cash such as the US dollar or British pound, can bolster financial inclusion because customers don’t have to have a bank account to hold them; they can instead use encrypted “digital wallets” that exist in the cloud, on a desktop or laptop, or even on USB storage device.
From Government-backed digital money to represent $213B in payments by 2030 | Computerworld:
xxx
xxx
Two consumer groups, AGE (“the voice of older persons at EU level”) and BEUC (“the European Consumer Organisation”), have voiced concerns about financial inclusion not being given sufficient consideration in developing the digital euro. AGE is worried that financial inclusion is an afterthought in the central bank digital currency (CBDC) design. BEUC is concerned that using the same intermediaries, such as banks, is unlikely to achieve better financial inclusion outcomes. Part of the issue is a focus on smartphone usage.
AGE and BEUC expressed their opinions as members of the Euro Retail Payments Board (ERPB).
From Digital euro: Consumer groups say financial inclusion given low priority – Ledger Insights – blockchain for enterprise:
xxx
x
Financial inclusion is a commonly cited motive for CBDCs, though the Bank is somewhat circumspect about this. It makes the sensible point that the financially excluded are likely also to be digitally excluded, making the design of digital wallets to address that group difficult. It also implies that financial inclusion is the government’s job, not the Bank’s
From CBDC: Bank of England offers support for private sector it doesn’t trust – OMFIF:
xxx