When people read about the scale of online deception—and there are new stories that illustrate the scale of the problem every single day—their antural reaction is to call for some form of internet passport and to demand that discussion need to show the real name of the participants. Even setting aside for a moment the problem of decided what “real” means in this context, this view is misguided. Real names don’t fix anything, but real reputations do.
xxx
What matters, it seems, is not so much whether you are commenting anonymously, but whether you are invested in your persona and accountable for its behaviour in that particular forum. There seems to be value in enabling people to speak on forums without their comments being connected, via their real names, to other contexts. The online comment management company Disqus, in a similar vein, found that comments made under conditions of durable pseudonymity were rated by other users as having the highest quality.
From: Online anonymity: study found ‘stable pseudonyms’ created a more civil environment than real user names.
xxx
I wrote this in 2007.
We need to build general-purpose identity solutions that can cope with these kinds of one-the-fly, transient and even pseudonymous identities as well as persistent identities. That’s why I think the right digital identity models are those in which the industrial age one-to-one mapping between the person and an identity is understood as a niche and not as the paradigm. As was well-put on Ideal Government recently, multiple identities are part of the solution, not part of the problem of information age identity. As Sam Smith says, “one account and one account only for individuals mandates total transparency from the citizen. It requires complete faith in government. It discourages any transparency on the part of that Government. That’s not very balanced, is it?”
From Age vs. identities – Consult Hyperion.
xxx
xxx
However, very large online platforms identified under the Digital Services Act, like Google and Facebook, will have to support the wallet for logging into their service.
From EU institutions prepare to negotiate the European Digital Identity – EURACTIV.com:
xxx
xxx
The MEPs also clarified the relationship with the EU General Data Protection Regulation. They included the right for users to use pseudonyms to protect their personal data when there is no legal requirement for identification.
From EU institutions prepare to negotiate the European Digital Identity – EURACTIV.com:
xxx