Myth 1: Financial inclusion reduces poverty Financial inclusion can have many positive impacts on people on low incomes, but they are not always what might be expected. Contrary to popular belief,
financial inclusion has little effect on poverty re- duction. In particular, access to credit – often touted as the most beneficial kind of financial inclusion – has mixed effects. An extensive review article (Duvendack and Mader, 2020) explains that while microcredit certainly provides benefits to some (such as allowing people to start a business or pay school fees) it rarely lifts people out of poverty, and indeed some people get trapped in debt cycles and end up poorer. Instead, decades of analysis reveal that microsavings (ac-counts designed for small deposits) provide the most consistently positive impact, since they provide benefits with few risks. Access to financial services can also help increase people’s incomes, either through receiving remittances or simply by making it easier for people to pay each other.
Moreover, the World Bank finds evidence that the use of financial accounts (with a bank, MFI or mobile money provider) supports the development towards broader use of financial tools including saving, borrowing and insurance. This helps people to increase their financial resilience and counteract issues of not being able to manage aspects such as unemployment, medical bills or school fees.
We would also add that financial inclusion can substantially reduce people’s stress and make their lives easier – two benefits whose importance cannot be understated. The benefits of financial inclusion for reducing ‘transaction costs’ (usually defined as the time a person spends completing a task) have been noted extensively by researchers working in many different countries. Our research participants in rural Brazil particularly appreciated the arrival of the payments platform Pix because it meant they did not have to travel to town to withdraw cash as frequently. Saving people time and effort can greatly reduce stress because people are often juggling many different activities and struggle to complete them all.
This is particularly evident among people who are very poor or lack basic infrastructure such as paved roads, reliable telecommunications