Research from the Reserve Bank Australia (Fairweather et al, Valuing Safety and Privacy in Retail Central Bank Digital Currency. 2024) shows up some interesting consumer attitudes around a digital fiat currency. At high level it tells us that consumers do not care about safety (they do not distinguish between commercial bank money and central bank money as nerds like me do) but they do care about privacy, to the extent that they are willing to pay for it. Interesting.
I used Reserve Bank’s research to create a useful thought experiment. Their paper explores the merits of a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) in Australia, focusing on the extent to which consumers would value having access to a digital form of money that is even safer and potentially more private than commercial bank deposits. This is consistent with bank deposits in Australia already being perceived as a safe form of money (because of a deposit protection scheme) and physical cash continuing to be available as an alternative option. So therefore you cannot charge consumers for a CBDC on the basis of safety.
When it comes to privacy though, there is a different perception. Consumers say that they value transaction anonymity and that they care about who transaction data is shared with, to the extrent that they are prepared to pay A$5 more for an account that shares transaction data with the central bank instead of wich commercial banks, assuming that Australia’s financial crime authority, AUSTRAC (Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre), can access the transaction data in ierther case.That would generate around $60m per annum to contrbute to the running of the system.
So could we fund a CBDC this way?
I was flattered to be invited to join a panel of luminaries to discuss the issue of money and privacy at the European Forum Alpbach 2024 and in attempt to show the audience that there are some interesting discussions to be had around business model, I talked about the need for privacy, but not for anonymity.
Policymakers probably could not introduce a retail CBDC with complete anonymity, on account of the financial crime implications. But it could be designed in such a way that it restricts data sharing to different entities compared to existing forms of digital money, or even allow for anonymity for small transactions (European Central Bank 2023).
I was flattered to be ask to take part in a discussion about privacy and CBDC at the