Snippings

xxx

By 2026, at least 500 million smartphone users will be regularly making verifiable claims using a digital identity wallet built on distributed ledger technology, according to Gartner, Inc.

Decentralized identity (DCI) based on distributed ledger technology is used for user verification, identifying, and tying a physical person to an identity wallet, and for user authentication and authorization, authenticating that user and authorizing them to access resources and data.

Traditional centralized approaches to managing identity data often fall short in user experience, security, and privacy. DCI offers a transformative solution by eliminating central data stores and enhancing user experience through simple smartphone applications. It ensures security via the integrity of robust identity verification mechanisms and preserves privacy through consent management and the use of privacy-preserving protocols such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), which provide pseudonymity. This approach addresses key issues like identity verification, fraud, and account takeovers, making it a superior alternative to conventional methods.

From: Gartner predicts 500 million smartphone users will be making verifiable claims using a digital identity wallet built on distributed ledger technology by 2026.

xxx

xxx

Credit card issuers explicitly and directly charge the rest of the economy for the work involved in recruiting the most desirable customers.

From: Anatomy of a credit card rewards program.

xxx

 

The Commerce Commission of New Zealand has just published a consultation paper on the osts to businesses and consumers of card payments which makes the same point. They summarise the situation clearly: where there is no surcharging, consumers who choose to pay through lower cost card payment options (eg, PIN debit) or cash, subsidise other card users through higher retail prices and where there is a blanket surcharge, debit card users subsidise credit card users.

xxx

Supermarket chain Waitrose went ‘cash only’ in some stores today as its card machines went down.

A spokesperson for the firm confirmed around lunchtime today that its contactless payments were up and running again.

They added that John Lewis had not been affected.

From: Full list of shops, banks, travel companies and events affected by the global IT meltdown – as shoppers are urged to pay in cash after outage left customers unable to make card payments | Daily Mail Online.

xxx

xxx

Once you agree, the feature will let you scan and save two types of documents: normal and private. The normal documents, such as your Student ID or business card, won’t require biometric authentication when you add or access them. Whereas, private documents like your Tax ID, Driver’s license, or other government-issued ID cards will require biometric authentication. The feature will automatically identify, scan, and categorize several types of documents, including Loyalty cards, Passports, Resident permits, Student IDs, Tax IDs, Vehicle registration, Voter IDs, Library cards, ID cards, Health insurance, Event passes and tickets, Driver’s license, Car insurance, and Business cards. However, if it can’t identify a document, it will automatically assign it to the “Other” category and give you the option to enter information manually.

From: Here’s an early look at how Google Wallet will let you scan and save anything (APK teardown).

xxx

Does any

Americans for Common Cents is not a registered nonprofit, nor is it a business entity in Washington, D.C. In fact, it really only exists on paper and in cyberspace. ACC has the classic characteristics of a “front group,” a phantom organization backed by business, but with no visible ties to the business.

Weller denies ACC is a front group, and says he has been “very upfront that ACC has a major sponsor in Jarden Zinc Products.”

From: Saving the penny makes cents for zinc-backed front group – Center for Public Integrity.

xxx

 

xxx

The Treasury has placed no new orders for coins this year for the first time as it was revealed that more than a third of UK adults are living largely cashless lives.

Ministers have decided not to ask the Royal Mint for any new coins, believing there are enough in circulation already, as the number of payments made by cash continued to fall.

From: No new coins minted this year for first time.

xxx

A Treasury spokesman said it is not expected to order any new 1p or 2p coins in the coming years, as there are around 27 billion coins in circulation.

 

It was reported that officials were considering scrapping the copper coins altogether, as part of a package of suggestions being prepared for ministers. However, the department denied this was the case, with the spokesman adding: “We are not scrapping 1p or 2p coins. We are confident there are enough coins in the system without the need to order more this year.”

xxx

We should not be investing in producing coins with a better anti-counterfeiting coating, we should be letting coins fade into oblivion, starting with an immediate end to the production of 1p and 2p pieces.

From Let the coins go | Consult Hyperion.

xxx

xxx

The Isle of Man is the first part of the British Isles to encourage companies to round prices to the nearest five pence amid declining use of copper.

Due to rising production costs and an increasingly cashless society, the Crown Dependency stopped minting Manx pennies and two pence pieces in 2016.

The island’s currency, the Manx pound, is not legal tender in the United Kingdom, but pound coins and banknotes are accepted there.

Now the Isle of Man Treasury has urged local traders to consider rounding payments “to the nearest five pence” as it prepares for small change to gradually disappear from circulation altogether.

From: Is this the beginning of the end for 1p and 2p coins? The British Isles that say “round up.” – Worldtimetodays.

xxx

Jo Braithwaite, Professor of Law, London School of Economics Law School, LSE, 

Overall, the article argues that the priority for UK regulators should be to develop a more ‘joined-up’ response to APP fraud, and it offers generally applicable insights into effective regulatory responses to this evolving threat.

From: ‘Authorized Push Payment’ Bank Fraud: What Does an Effective Regulatory Response Look Like? | Journal of Financial Regulation | Oxford Academic.

xxx

xxx

As Booysen has put it, in a different context, ‘Payment systems are matters of national interest, and payment architecture influences economic success.

From: ‘Authorized Push Payment’ Bank Fraud: What Does an Effective Regulatory Response Look Like? | Journal of Financial Regulation | Oxford Academic.

xxx

xxx

Later this month, people in Berlin will be able to book an hour with an AI sex doll as the world’s first cyber brothel rolls out the service following a test phase.
Customers will be able to interact verbally with the AI dolls as well as physically.

From: Concern rises over AI in adult entertainment – BBC News.

xxx

In response to a hearing in front of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on 23rd July concerning Zelle and fraud, the American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) and the National Bankers Association (NBA) issued a joint statement noting that banks cannot stop criminals by themselves and suggesting that when it comes to dealing with the tidal wave of fraud overwhelming the financial system, there are other players who need to up to plate “from telecommunications firms to social media companies to law enforcement”. They are right to demand action.

The U.K. Government’s “Future of Payments Review”, written by the respected business leader Joe Garner (hence media references to the “Garner review”), was published at the end of last year. The report covers many aspects of the British payments sector, including the kinds of fraud and financial crime that the House Permanent Subcommittee were looking, at comes to a similar concusion. Specifically it refers to the allocation of responsibilities for tackling such crimes, including the need to develop high level principles of liability which simply cannot be left as they are with banks responsible for compensation under the Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM).

(I thought that the most interesting statement in the report can be found on page 26, where Mr. Garner says that “we could not find any clear and agreed vision of the long-term future or desired ‘end-state’ of the payments landscape”. I suppose this is to be expected, because the U.K does not have any clear and agreed vision of the long-term future of anything at all and there is no reason for payments to be any different.)

Britain’s payment providers have been pushed into the CRM which means, essentially, that if you send money to fraudsters, the bank has to give your money back. This is unsustainable (especially since that liability will soon be increased to something like half a million dollars per case) and it cannot be remedied without action on digital identity.

 

 

To resolve questions of interoperability between key initiatives. The key initiatives that the report is talking about here are Open Banking, New Payments Architecture (NPA) and maybe Central Bank Digital Currency. It seems obvious to me that an effective way to respond to the need for resilience set out earlier is to create both the instant payments infrastructure (ie, money that goes through banking networks) and the central bank digital currency infrastructure (ie, money that goes from device to device) that are not co-dependent.

Take a position regarding Digital ID for payments. Well, they saved the best until last. There’s no way forward in the payments sector without something getting done about digital identity. The question in my mind is whether it is better for the payment sector to lobby the Government to do something about digital identity or to give up and do something about digital identity themselves. Personally, I think it might be time to dust off some of this old discussions about some form of financial services passport.

I cannot help but note that the strategy does not have a measurable target. I can understand why: since no-one knows how much payments cost society as a whole, it is difficult to assess whether the sector is working or not. I might have been tempted to recommend that the Government commission a study to measure the overall total social cost of payments (this is complicated, but it has been done in other others) and then set a five year target to reduce it by using a combination of competition and regulation to respond to the issues set out above.

xxx

Ever since the dawn of relationships, scammers have found ways to take advantage of people by spinning a convincing tale. But with the rise in online dating, these scams have proliferated, evolving into more sophisticated long cons to win the trust of victims. According to the FTC report, the most popular way scammers reached out to their victims last year was through Instagram (29%) and Facebook (28%).

From Romance Scams Are Booming — Especially on Facebook and Instagram:

xxx

xxx

The Brazilian central bank has pushed back the addition of recurring payments to its Pix platform from October until next June.

Automatic Pix will facilitate recurring charges that let users authorise periodic debits automatically, without the need for authentication for each transaction.

The central bank predicts the feature will be useful for a host of options, including schools, colleges, gyms, condominiums, social clubs, health plans, streaming services, news portals, subscription clubs, and FS firms.

From: Brazil delays launch of recurring Pix payments.

xxx