Apple (correctly) thinks that apps and websites should implement age assurance, an exemplar of credentials-based transactions that depend on a digital identity infrastructure that doesn’t yet exist, whereas Meta (incorrectly) thinks that age assurance is a great idea as long as they don’t have to do it and that the app stores should take care of it.
We all know what the problem is. None of us want children seeing inappropriate and potentially dangerous material online. But they do. All the time.
xxx
A new Ofcom survey shows that 22 percent of eight-to-17 year olds lie that they are 18 or over on social media apps, easily bypassing flaccid self-declaring age assurance methods.
From: Kids are bypassing weak age assurance measure in droves, and it has to change: Ofcom | Biometric Update.
xxx
xxx
The Australian government has pledged to legislate an age limit of 16 years for social media access, with penalties for online platforms that do not comply.
But the Labor government has not spelled out how it expects Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and others to actually enforce that age limit. Anthony Albanese is facing pressure from the Coalition opposition to rush the bill through parliament in the next three weeks, although a federal trial into age assurance technology has not yet commenced.
Albanese and the communications minister, Michelle Rowland, did not rule out the potential for social media users to have their faces subject to biometric scanning, for online platforms to verify users’ ages using a government database, or for all social media users – regardless of age – being subject to age checks, only saying it would be up to tech companies to set their own processes.
From: Australia to ban under-16s from social media – but can’t say how TikTok, Instagram and others will enforce it | Internet safety | The Guardian.
xxx
xxx
Apple has released a white paper that lays out its position on age assurance and outlines new tools it will roll out to “help parents protect their kids in a way that is designed around privacy.” It also formally and firmly states its belief that the responsibility for age assurance measures should be on apps offering age-restricted content – and not app stores that offer them for download.
Its publication has drawn a response from Meta, which is among the loudest firms saying that age assurance should be handled by app stores, continuing a back-and-forth that has also drawn in the porn industry and digital rights activists.
From: Apple volleys age verification question back to sites and apps | Biometric Update.
Apple (correctly) thinks that apps and websites should implement age assurance (which I take to be an exemplar of credentials-based transactions that depned on a digital identity infrastructure) whereas Meta (incorrectly) thinks that age assurance is a great idea as long as they don’t have to do it.