xxx
For VCs to be viable beyond low-risk use cases, they must be embedded within a governance framework that provides the “commercial accountability” to complement the “cryptographic assurance”.
Indeed. The core issues of liability and interchange must be agreed if we are going to see any progress at all. Now, it is clearly not beyond the bounds of human ingenuity to come up with an optimisation to balance the interests of the stakeholders with the interests of society as a whole. One ancient template for such might be found buried in the sedimentary layers of digital identity from the early days. Identrust opted for a (bank-centric) model of transactional liability. In other words, if you say that I am Dave Birch, and I use that credential to get a loan, and it then turns out I am not Dave Birch at all, then you should be liable for the loan default, but not for any contingent liabilities.
This must be linked to an interchange model that maybe charges different interchanges amounts depending on the nature of the transaction, not the size of the transaction. Buying a beer with proof of age, 0.002 cents. Buying a house with proof of mortgage offer, $20 or something.