The old bank/card model is still entrenched in the rich world

xxx

Hence a third strategy, to build an alternative payment method for existing repeat customers, rather like the RedCard of Target, a big retailer. RedCard offers customers 5% discounts on Target purchases, encouraging them to spend at Target over its competitors. Some 20% of the firm’s $100bn annual revenues come through RedCard.

From The old bank/card model is still entrenched in the rich world:

xxx

Implementing something like Target Red, but using FedNow, sounds good.

Central-bank digital currencies are talked about more than coming to fruition

xxx

Yet it would be wrong to write off cbdcs. Central banks are the ultimate settlement institution of any financial system. A “wholesale” cbdc, accessible only to certain financial institutions, could make payments systems more competitive by giving fintechs access to central banks directly rather than through banks. cbdcs might help upgrade cross-border payments, making possible instant settlement across pairs of currencies. Even for countries that have advanced payment systems, there is a case for a cbdc to influence standards governing the design of newfangled currencies. It is not inconceivable that cbdcs could one day go mainstream. Despite recent scepticism, the hardly hypeish deputy governor of the Bank of England, Sir Jon Cunliffe, has said it is likely that a “digital pound will be needed in the uk.”

From Central-bank digital currencies are talked about more than coming to fruition:

xxx

A digital payments revolution in India

xxx

There are other flaws with upi. Transaction success rates, a key metric that can encourage more spending, are lower than for payment systems in developed markets. Financial-data sharing, which promotes competition among banks and unlocks access to credit, has been slow to take off. Sahamati, an association of account aggregators, finds that the number of linked accounts has grown to 5m in April 2023. But that is small when set against India’s vast population.

From A digital payments revolution in India:

xxx

A digital payments revolution in India

xxx

Customer protection has suffered. A survey by Renuka Sane, an Indian economist, and her co-authors, found that 18% of upi users had some grievance with the system, such as fraud or a mistaken payment. Less than 30% have seen their complaints resolved. Uttam Nayak, a former boss of Visa in India, notes that, although upi has rapidly growing volumes, the overall transaction value has not taken off as much. Consumers prefer safer payment methods for big-ticket items. “I use upi to buy chai. But I wouldn’t use it for a plane ticket,” says one architect based in Mumbai.

From A digital payments revolution in India:

xxx

A digital payments revolution in India

xxx

Yet the state-led, zero-fee model has downsides. Indian bankers claim that a shortage of revenue has dissuaded banks and fintech firms from investing in consumer protection. “There are tech costs, maintenance costs, fraud and dispute costs,” complains one. “Why would a financial firm incur all those expenditures when there’s no revenue stream?” asks Ajay Shah of the xkdr Forum, a think-tank in Mumbai. “This is a wake up call…maybe the answer is to charge a little more,” says Mr Rajan, the former rbi governor.

From A digital payments revolution in India:

xxx

Lessons learned from the world’s first CBDC – Suomen Pankin Julkaisuarkisto

Aleksi Grym, writing in the Bank of Finland Economic Review (August 2020), suggests that the story of the Avant electronic cash system can provide valuable perspective to the ongoing discussions regarding CBDC, and I agree. Specifically, he notes a key difference between Avant and the CBDC systems being designed today is that for modern CBDC systems cards would probably be an additional feature which is absolutely correct. But I think that another important difference is that Avant was for purchases, whereas a CBDC is a

 

The promise of crypto has not lived up to its initial excitement

xxx

A study by the World Bank finds that cross-border remittance costs have fallen from 7% a decade ago to 5%. And if consumers are savvy enough to use the best option (often a new-age fintech)? Transfer costs may then fall to just 3%.

From The promise of crypto has not lived up to its initial excitement:

xxx

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started