xxx
in a court filing from last week, Google admitted that “the open web is already in rapid decline,”
From: Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ | The Verge.
xxx
In that court filing Google said that:
“The fact is that today, the open web is already in rapid decline and Plaintiffs’ divestiture proposal would only accelerate that decline, harming publishers who currently rely on open-web display advertising revenue.”
The people who run Google are not stupid, and they have seen what the transition to the post-web (that is, the web but for AI agents, not for people) will mean.
Is it time to start thinking about micropayments again? In particular, since most everything on the post-web will be produced by AI and since most everything on the post-web will be consumed by AI, is time to start thinking about AI-AI micropayments?
xxx
I’m not the only person who was wondering about this. The noted venture capitalist Marc Andreessen knows more about the web than I ever will, and back in 2012 he told a Wired magazine conference in New York that “we should have built payments in the browser”.
(They got half way, because buried in your browser, in addition to the familiar error 404 for page-not-found, there is also error 402 for page-requires-payment. But no payment mechanism was provided.)
I note that the Collisons (the genius brothers behind Stripe) were also quoted arguing that the lack of effective payments mechanism is the reason that the web went from being an open environment and opportunity for all to an “oligopoly controlled by five companies now worth more than $3 trillion”.
From: Micropayments Are A Macro Opportunity.
xxx
xxx
“When Berners-Lee and his team were building the world wide web and designing HTTP and HTMP standards, they included error codes such as ‘500: internal server error’, or ‘404: page not found’. In the early 90s, they were trying to realise Licklider’s vision and setting out the rules for how we were all going to interact over this information network. One long-standing error code is ‘402: payment required’. The original intention – the reason 402 is reserved for future use – was that this code would be used to transact digital cash or micropayments. It has never been implemented – and the Collisons argue this is the reason tech is turning from an equal access opportunity to an oligopoly controlled by five companies now worth more than $3 trillion.”
From “The untold story of Stripe, the secretive $20bn startup driving Apple, Amazon and Facebook | WIRED UK”.
xxx
xxx
In Micropayments and Mental Transaction Costs, Nick Szabo pinpointed a truth that technologists often overlooked: while computational costs (like processing payments, preventing fraud, or validating cryptography) can be driven down, the mental overhead of deciding, monitoring, or worrying about every tiny expense remains stubbornly high.
From: Szabo’s Micropayments and Mental Transaction Costs: 25 Years Later – Bitcoin Magazine – Bitcoin News, Articles and Expert Insights.
xxx
This is why I was so interested to see that Louis Amira, Stripe’s former head of crypto & AI partnerships, and David Noel-Romas, Stripe’s former head of crypto engineering, have raised $19 million in seed funding for their new venture Circuit & Chisel. They are launching ATXP, a new protocol that enables AI agents to handle the commerce lifecycle (from discovery to payment) autonomously. The protocol, which be compatible with other new developments in the space such as Coinbase’s X.402 protocol. What particularly caught my eye was their intention for ATXP to enable low cost micropayments that are initiated, negotiated and executed entirely by agents.
xxx
Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz said that AI agents will soon become the top users of stablecoins.
During an interview with Bloomberg published on Wednesday, Novogratz said that “in the not-so-distant future, the biggest user of stablecoins is going to be AI.”
From: AI Agents to be top stablecoin users: Galaxy’s Novogratz.
xxx