The head of Britain’s National Health Service recently said that it is seeing more people turn up in their specialised gambling clinics having become hooked on crypto trading. and British politicians some time ago urged the government to treat retail investment in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin as a form of gambling. Whether cryptocurreny trading is best characterised as a financial market, gambling or a new form of e-sport, it is undoubtedly causing problems.
xxx
Writing in the Colombia Law School blog on capital markets, Todd Baker challenges the view that cryptocurrencies are financial assets, saying that this risks luring policymakers into a “potentially catastrophic category error” because their markets are not economically related to the financial system and do not serve the productive purposes of the financial system. He regards cryptocurrency players as finance LARPers* and calls their activities “gambling emulating finance”. Frankly, he has a point. In many ways, the cryptocurrency markets have more in common with electronic sports than e-finance.
From: Let’s Not Throw The Crypto Baby Out With The Crypto Bathwater.
xxx
I remember hearing someone at an event (I can’t remember who was talking or whar the event was, unfortunately) say that buying cryptocurrency was just like playing roulette, which I suppose is sort of true if like playing a form of roulette where the richest players are controlling the wheel and have a stake in the casino.
In many ways, cryptocurrency investing (at the retail level) is much worse for individuals that gamling is. After all, if you go to Las Vegas for the weekend, you know exactly what is going on. The rules are clear. The odds are fixed. In Vegas, you know that you will have a fun time playing roulette with your friends, but you also know that you will lose because the house has 5.26% edge. My favourite casino game is blackjack, and I have enjoyed many late night sessions with friends, a few drinks and split eights. Blackjack happens to have the best odds of all of the casino games with a 0.5% edge to the house. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose. But overall I lose, as does everyone else, and I’m happy to pay the half-a-percent fun tax down Fremont street.
In comparison, cryptocurrency markets are thin, opaque and manipulated. No-one knows what’s going on, especially as more and more trading heads into dark markets.
Nathan Davies and Simon Ferris from the University of Nottingham Medical School, writing in The Lancet, make a rather interesting (and to me, at least, rather compelling) argument that cryptocurrency trading harms public health in a similar way to gambling.
Although gambling harm is increasingly appraised through a public health lens, researchers and policy makers should also consider new financial instruments that have features of gamblification when seeking to research or reduce the burden of harm of gambling. Otherwise, new harmful products might fill the space left by public health and regulatory measures taken against traditional gambling products.
Public Health England estimates societal gambling- related harm in England exceeds £1·27 billion. Australian research estimates that the years lost to disability from gambling exceeds that of diabetes.1
xxx
ECB board member Fabio Panneta says trading in unbacked digital assets should be treated by regulators like gambling.
In a blog post, Panetta describes crypto investments as a gamble disguised as an investment asset.
“They do not perform any socially or economically useful function,” he says. “They are rarely used for payments and do not fund consumption or investment. As a form of investment, unbacked cryptos lack any intrinsic value, too. They are speculative assets.”
From ECB executive says gambling rules should be applied to curb crypto speculation:
xxx