xxx
That seems to be the hot topic of the day, as agentic businesses continue to promise a world of integrations, where AI is deputized to make financial decisions on behalf of users. Want to earn rewards on a purchase? Let your agent decide on the best payment method. Need to cancel or change a subscription? Your agent can do that for you. Miss a bill payment? Your agent will catch it and make sure you’re current.
But with new payment methods come new fraud vectors, and it’s unclear where liability will sit for disputed transactions. If you didn’t mean to pay for something, is that the agent’s responsibility, the merchant’s, your bank’s, or yours? Can someone trick your agent into making fraudulent purchases, and if they do, who is on the hook?
There are also authorization questions to answer: How can agents sit in fraud auth flows like liveness verification, device 2FA, pin number entry, etc.? And if they’re able to do so easily – how can payments providers quickly improve their auth flows to prevent AI payment spamming? (Incidentally, one of our newest investments from the fund, BKey, is looking to prevent just that.)From: Would you let an AI agent make payments for you? (TWIF 11/29).
xxx