POST Federated pseudonymity

xxx

There is less danger of a panopticon where digital money balances are issued by a plurality of profit‐​seeking competing banks and other private firms. Competing banks do not deny access to certain customers based on suspicions about those customers’ loyalty to the bank.7 Unless a customer requests it, banks do not share client account information with rival firms. Where there is suspicion of a crime, banks may be compelled to share information with the police.

From Should the State or the Market Provide Digital Currency? | Cato Institute:

I agree, of course, and have been consistent in my view that federated strong pseudonymity is the best way to organise the digital cash infrastructure necessary to support a digital currency.

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started